This user is trying to make a big list of the common sense (began in 2009). Oh it has taken too long...
The real problem behind the "not for extensive discussions" thing is probably that some answers on some subsites tries to appear formal and complete, while in fact, nobody knows an ideal answer. It could be still understandable on Workspace, but obviously horrible on Parenting. Answers on some other websites that nobody ever wanted a discussion usually tries to appear informal to acknowledge that "this might not be the perfect answer, but hope it has helped you a bit". On the other hand, they are more permissive to personal opinions and duplicates, instead, as a result. Alternatively, they simply don't have a commenting feature, but visible downvotes, to acknowledge that this answer is not verified by many.
Member for 3 years, 1 month
0 profile views
Last seen Jul 29 '17 at 13:14
- Code Golf 34.7k 34.7k 66 gold badges6868 silver badges139139 bronze badges
- Puzzling 1.1k 1.1k 99 silver badges1515 bronze badges
- Unix & Linux 797 797 11 gold badge44 silver badges1717 bronze badges
- Area 51 625 625 1010 bronze badges
- Information Security 590 590 33 silver badges1111 bronze badges
- View network profile
Keeping a low profile.
This user hasn't posted yet.
Jul 29 '17