This answer was a one-line answer when posted, I replied on a comment mentioning how the answer didn't actually solved my problem and I explained why. User proceeded to edit his answer and in reality it was a really poor edit as in:
- It didn't elaborate on the main idea of the answer
- Added another solution (which is not encouraged on the site, different answers should be posted as individual answers)
- New solution was based on an assumption
I let OP know that the edit is bad and pointless cause he's assuming things about the question's OP (since assumptions deviate original intent). I proceeded to downvote the answer and flag it as very-low-quality, flag which was declined under the reason of:
flags should not be used to indicate technical inaccuracies, or an altogether wrong answer
Which it's somewhat odd, considering a mod included this message for OP
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
So I'm left with a huge question mark on top of my head. If this answer shouldn't have been flagged as very-low-quality then how should have I flagged it as?