Can we have a new flag reason and review queue for "This isn't a hack"?

Inspired, somewhat, by this question, answers can be given that are 0.00% hackish. I think we can all agree that these don't help the community.

I propose that there is a new flag reason...

it is not a hack

This answer does not contain a lifehack. It is therefore off-topic, and may have to be removed.

...along with a new queue:

Non-hack answers

Which has the options:

  • Recommend deletion (0.00% lifehack)
  • Looks OK
  • Looks OK + Upvote

If the answer is deleted via sufficient Recommend Deletion votes, the question should be added to the "Low Quality Posts" queue, with a notation that

N non-lifehack answers have been deleted from this question. Please especially consider if the question is on-topic.

  • 1
    While this may be useful in the future (it may fit under Not an answer reason), right now when the scope of Lifehacks isn't decided it would be difficult to vote on Dec 11 '14 at 15:06
  • @ZachSaucier I think the term "lifehack" will be forever ambiguous. What one person considers a "hack", another may consider "common sense".
    – Mooseman
    Dec 11 '14 at 15:39
  • I disagree. I think this answer says it well: a lifehack is an unconventional solution Dec 11 '14 at 15:44
  • @ZachSaucier conventional is cultural. What one would consider unconventional (or a solution) can be considered normal, common-sense or trivial by another. The term is ambiguous. I agree with Mooseman that this will stay that way. Dec 11 '14 at 15:49
  • @AngeloFuchs I address that in this meta post of mine. As for how to handle multiple cultures' "normals", we'll need to wait for an example case Dec 11 '14 at 15:51
  • @ZachSaucier I gave an example in that very thread (the orange peeler). Dec 11 '14 at 15:55
  • If you're asking for specific features to help moderate your site the second day in, that's a pretty decent sign you're going well outside the SE defined framework. And that you should work to pull it back in, not stretch the framework.
    – fbueckert
    Dec 11 '14 at 18:22
  • 1
    I think we can all agree that these don't help the community. I think the community is pretty far from agreement on that.
    – Sterno
    Dec 11 '14 at 19:16

SE usually gives custom close reasons for questions, but rarely (if ever) custom flag reasons for answers.

I'm going to give the same advice i did on Mi Yodeya Meta:

If an answer honestly tries to answer the question, then it looks OK. It might be a bad answer, worthy of being downvoted, but that's for outside the VLQ queue.

(VLQ means deleting, here.)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .